Are iPods the best or worst thing to happen to the music industry?

Posted on 17. Oct, 2009 by admin in ipods

ipods


Digitally purchased or shared music is making CD sales capsize, and iPods have impacted them considerably. At the same time, iPods make listening to music an extremely convenient and more visually enthralling experience. Are iPods ultimately going to contribute to the death or reemergence of the music industry?

3 secrets to making a living online.. Quit your job now!

Related posts:

  1. How do I put different music on 2 different iPods using the same computer? Hello there! If you are new here, you might want...
  2. How do I download different music to different kinds of ipods threw the same computer? Hello there! If you are new here, you might want...
  3. How do I download music to 2 different iPods from one computer? Hello there! If you are new here, you might want...
  4. How do you transfer music between ipods? Hello there! If you are new here, you might want...
  5. How do you put two ipods onto 1 itunes without getting each others songs? Hello there! If you are new here, you might want...

Tags: , ,

6 Comments

officialmaddy

18. Oct, 2009

The best of course.

TiffanyC :]

20. Oct, 2009

Ipods are simply the best=]
I have a custom made pink Ipod touch.
I absolutely adore it.
You should get one.

Mimi

22. Oct, 2009

ipods are the best thing that could have happened to the music industry.

ewennington

25. Oct, 2009

possibly one of the things thats killing the music industry. but the music phones are more so. i thought a simple use of a phone was to talk on it and text not to bust out tunes?

thinkpinkprep89

26. Oct, 2009

that depends on if you work for Mac or not! :D

undercut

29. Oct, 2009

Great question. I hadn’t considered it until you made me put my cereal down.

The problem with digitally purchased music is the best albums tell stories and aren’t merely compilations of songs. Each song is related to the mood of the writer and the album flows. Check out the Foo Fighters’ latest to get a gist of what I mean.

Anyway, buying only one song at a time is detrimental to the experience of the album. However, the last twenty years have really been crappy in terms of great albums. By great I mean essentially what I wrote earlier, in that the whole album is good, maybe not the first or second time, but years down the road when one finds it in his 200 cd book and sticks it in and really jams to it. Those are the best “records.”

What this means is after the two singles are released, the rest of the album is just filler, and it’s not even whole milk filler; more like the horrible 1% skim milk that looks like cloudy water. The product (in general) has been so bad lately that I’m hesitant to buy a cd new and will generally wait to see if I can get it used.

The music industry has done it to themselves. They’ve been producing so many crappy products for so long that people are digging out their old music just to fill the drive time. With Metallica so worried and crying about the sharing of music (and it is illegal), new bands are hard to find and many play the same riffs, just in different order, anyway.

To answer your question, I say iPods are neither. The music ***** not because of the iPod, but because of the consumers’ overwhelming ability to settle for the crap the industry is making. Good music is good, and the bad eventually disappears into oblivion and takes the intellect of it’s fans with it.

The iPod and mp3 players, if anything, have made people learn what song goes with which artist and makes the discussion of music (however bleak) enlivening. And that’s what music is about: bringing people together. As Hendrix said, “Young, energized people will either go to a concert or a riot.” I choose the former.

Leave a reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes